sinatra.dev
← All comparisons

Sinatra vs Factory

Factory's droids. Compared here on the hosted platform plus the droid-action GitHub workflow, with the Droid CLI called out where it behaves differently.

Factory is a broad platform: a desktop app, a CLI, droid computers, automated code review. Sinatra is one workflow done end to end. The sharpest difference is what happens to your own API key. Factory's custom models work in the Droid CLI and desktop app but not on its hosted platforms, and its own pricing page says bring-your-own-key is free only up to an allowance. Sinatra takes your key or subscription everywhere and never bills you for the tokens. Factory wins on breadth, on code review, and on being a real editor-adjacent tool.

Feature
Sinatra
Factory
Native GitHub-issue trigger1
~
Native Linear-ticket assignee2
~
Replies in-thread on PR review3
~
Bring your own model key4
~
Runs on your Claude or ChatGPT subscription5
No markup on model usage6
Plan price and usage rate both published7
~
Free tier with a published daily quota8
Fully-managed tier (infra and model)9
IDE or editor surface10
Start a run from Slack11
Self-hosted or open-source option12
  1. Yes means the vendor's own app starts a run from the issue itself, with nothing to commit to the repo first. Sinatra's trigger is the Sinatra label that ships with the GitHub App install (`sinatraai` on the hosted app). Partial means either that a workflow file and an API-key secret have to be added per repository first, or that the mention only works on pull requests and not on issues.
  2. Yes means assigning the ticket to the agent in Linear starts the run. Partial means the run starts some other way: an attachment link you click, or a trigger you configure yourself against Linear's webhooks. Assignment on its own does nothing.
  3. Yes means a changes-requested review is enough on its own: Sinatra reworks the branch and pushes the follow-up commit with no re-trigger and no mention. Partial means the agent acts only when it is @-mentioned in the thread, or only while its original session is still open.
  4. Yes means your own provider API key runs the agent everywhere the product runs it. Partial means keys work on some surfaces but not the one being compared here, either because the vendor documents them as local-CLI-and-desktop only, or because it never documents them covering its cloud agent at all.
  5. Yes means a Claude Pro/Max or ChatGPT subscription you already pay for authenticates the run on the vendor's hosted cloud. Partial means it works only where that CLI's login already sits on the machine: your own laptop or a self-hosted backend, not a clean cloud sandbox.
  6. Yes means you are never charged a marked-up model rate, either because you pay your provider directly, or because the vendor publishes the same per-token rates the provider does, or because model use is included in a flat plan with a published allowance. Partial means the answer depends on which plan you are on: no fee on the individual tiers, a published per-token fee on the team ones, charged even against your own key.
  7. Both halves have to be published: the plan price, and the rate for work past the plan. A published seat price sitting on top of an undisclosed credit, compute unit, or quota size is partial.
  8. Yes means the free tier states its daily allowance as a number. Sinatra's is 5 tasks a day with your own key or a Codex subscription, 1 a day on Sinatra's keys, no card. Partial means a free plan exists but its allowance is not published.
  9. Yes means you can run without supplying a model key at all, because the vendor bills you for the model.
  10. Yes means an editor plugin or a desktop app; partial means a terminal CLI and nothing that runs inside an editor. Sinatra has neither, on purpose: the work starts in the tracker and comes back as a pull request. If you want an assistant inside your editor, that is a real reason to pick one of these instead, and several teams run both.
  11. Sinatra has no Slack trigger. GitHub and Linear are the only two ways to start a run, and a Slack-first team should weigh that.
  12. Yes means you can run the agent on infrastructure you control, or the source is open. Partial means execution or inference can be pointed at your own account while the product itself stays the vendor's and stays closed. Sinatra is hosted only; there is no self-managed build.

Read off each vendor's own documentation and pricing pages on September 3, 2026.

How you start it

Sinatra
  • Add the Sinatra label to a GitHub issue. The label ships with the GitHub App install and is named after the app (sinatraai on the hosted one)
  • Assign a Linear ticket to Sinatra, or @-mention it in a comment
Factory
  • @droid in a GitHub issue or pull request, once droid.yml is committed
  • The "Open in Factory" attachment link on a Linear issue
  • The Factory App and web platform
  • Droid CLI and Slack
Sinatra

$20 per member per month for hosted sandboxes and orchestration, with model cost passed through at provider rates and no markup. Free tier: 5 tasks a day with your own key or Codex, 1 a day on ours. No card.

Sinatra pricing
Factory

Pro $20/mo, Plus $100/mo, Max $200/mo, Teams $60/mo plus $40 a seat; Business and Enterprise are contact-sales. Usage runs on rolling 5-hour, 7-day, and 30-day rate limits plus prepaid Extra Usage credits.

Factory pricing page

How you start a task

Factory's center of gravity is the Factory App and the Droid CLI. The asynchronous paths are bolted on per repository: to get @droid answering in a GitHub issue you commit droid.yml and droid-review.yml and add a FACTORY_API_KEY secret, in every repository, with a secret to rotate.

Linear is looser still. Authorizing Factory puts an attachment on the issue with an "Open in Factory" link that always creates a new session. It carries context into a session; it is not a handoff, and assigning the ticket does nothing.

Sinatra's two triggers are both installs. Nothing lands in your repository and no key lands in your secrets.

What it costs, in dollars

The plan prices are published. How far they go is not: usage runs against three rolling rate-limit windows, each independent, and sessions consume Factory Standard Credits whose rate is not published either.

Then the line that matters most if you are shopping on cost. Factory's own individual-plan docs say bring-your-own-key "is free up to an allowance on all Individual plans. After that, usage is charged according to your specific plan." Bringing your own key to Factory lowers your bill. It does not decouple your bill from your usage, which is the entire reason people bring a key.

Sinatra is $20 per member per month plus your provider's own rate, with nothing added at any volume.

Where Sinatra wins

Your key is your key, everywhere and unmetered. Factory's custom models are documented as CLI-and-desktop only, and allowance-limited even there.

Linear is an assignment rather than a link, so nobody has to be at a keyboard at the moment work starts, which is the moment you were trying to automate. There is no per-repository plumbing either: no droid.yml, no API-key secret in each repo, just an App install and a label. And the free tier is a published number, 5 tasks a day with your own key or Codex, 1 a day on ours. No card. where Factory's entry point is $20.

Where Factory wins

Factory is a much larger product, and several of its strengths are things Sinatra has chosen not to build.

Code review of your team's pull requests is the big one: a CI workflow with configurable depth, a dedicated security mode covering STRIDE and the OWASP LLM Top 10, and a published benchmark. If you want an AI reviewer, Factory is the one to look at. Sinatra reviews only its own diff.

The Droid CLI, the Factory App, and Droid Computers make Factory something you work with interactively, where Sinatra has no editor surface and no interactive mode. Factory also documents droids answering production alerts in Slack, which Sinatra cannot do at all. On governance it supports self-managed GitHub Enterprise Server and GitLab, SSO, directory sync, and org controls over which models and base URLs are allowed, which is a deeper control plane than a custom contract. Spec mode, mission mode, and per-session autonomy levels give a cautious team dials Sinatra does not expose.

Looking for a Factory alternative?

Two things send people looking. The first is discovering bring-your-own-key is metered: you brought a key expecting the model bill to move to your provider, and it only partly did. The second is that the asynchronous story needs per-repository setup, so twenty repositories is twenty small jobs.

Sinatra answers both narrowly. Your key or subscription runs every task with nothing added at any volume, and the GitHub side is an App install plus a label rather than committed workflow files and a secret per repo. Rolling out across an organization is one install, with per-repository behavior in a committed .sinatrarc.

What Sinatra will not replace is the reviewer, the CLI, or the desktop app. If those are why you bought Factory, keep it.

Switching, or running both

Running both is easy and, for most teams evaluating this, correct. Factory answers to an @droid mention through its own workflow; Sinatra answers to a label. Neither reacts to the other. Put five tickets through each for a week, read the ten pull requests, then look at both bills, counting what your provider charged you directly on the Sinatra side.

Questions people ask about Factory and Sinatra

Does Factory support BYOK?

In the Droid CLI and desktop app only. Factory's own pricing docs also say bring-your-own-key is free up to an allowance, after which usage is charged according to your plan, so it lowers your bill without decoupling it from usage.

Can Factory start work from a Linear ticket?

Not by assignment. Connecting Factory puts an 'Open in Factory' attachment on the issue, and clicking it creates a new session; assigning the ticket does nothing.

What does Factory cost?

Pro $20 a month, Plus $100, Max $200, Teams $60 plus $40 a seat, with no free tier. Usage runs against rolling 5-hour, 7-day, and 30-day rate limits whose sizes are not published.

Is Factory better at code review?

For your team's pull requests, yes: it ships a review workflow with security modes and a published benchmark. Sinatra reviews only its own diff.

Where these facts came from

Factory sources, read September 3, 2026: docs.factory.ai/pricing/individuals, docs.factory.ai/model-independence/byok, docs.factory.ai/software-factory/linear, docs.factory.ai/software-factory/code-review-ci, github.com/Factory-AI/droid-action

Every mark on this page was read off Factory's own documentation and pricing pages on September 3, 2026, not from a third-party roundup. If something here is out of date or wrong, tell us and we will fix the page.

Related reading

Start free →See pricingCompare every alternative